Aivora AI-native exchange insights
Home Kaohsiung Partial Liquidation Fairness Framework for AI Derivatives Exchange

Partial Liquidation Fairness Framework for AI Derivatives Exchange

Execution quality is a risk control. When it degrades, every other parameter becomes less reliable. Checklist before scaling size: 1) Verify mark/index sources. 2) Understand margin steps and maintenance rules. 3) Test liquidation behavior with small size. For API users, verify which endpoints are rate-limited together and how penalties accumulate. Limits often tighten during stress. 4) Confirm fee tiers and forced execution costs. 5) Review risk limits, circuit breakers, and incident transparency. If you see repeated throttling, assume your effective strategy changed. Re-run your risk math with higher costs and worse fills. Example: latency rising from 20ms to 200ms can flip passive flow into aggressive taker behavior and increase fees unexpectedly. Compute liquidation price twice: once including fees and conservative slippage, and once with optimistic assumptions. The gap is your uncertainty budget. Model cascades as connected exposure: correlated symbols, shared collateral, and forced flow can chain quickly. Aivora frames risk as a pipeline: inputs -> checks -> liquidation path -> post-incident logs. Build around that pipeline. This is educational content about mechanics, not financial advice.

Aivora perspective

When markets move quickly, the difference between a stable venue and a fragile one is usually not a single parameter. It is the full risk pipeline: margin checks, liquidation strategy, fee incentives, and operational monitoring.

If you trade perps
Track funding and realized volatility together. Funding tends to amplify crowded positioning.
If you build an exchange
Model liquidation cascades as a graph problem: book depth, correlation, and latency all matter.
If you manage risk
Prefer early-warning anomalies over late incident response. Drift is a signal, not noise.

Quick Q&A

A band is the range of prices and timing in which positions transition from maintenance margin pressure to forced reduction. Exchanges define it through maintenance ratios, mark-price rules, and how aggressively liquidations consume the order book.
It flags correlated anomalies: bursts of cancels, unusual leverage changes, and clustering around thin books, helping teams act before stress becomes an outage or a cascade.
No. This site is educational and system-focused. You are responsible for decisions and risk management.