Aivora AI-native exchange insights
Home Germany AI Risk-managed Perp Exchange Testing Guide: Trade Surveillance Alerts

AI Risk-managed Perp Exchange Testing Guide: Trade Surveillance Alerts

The biggest edge is not a secret indicator; it is knowing what the system will do under stress. Primer: contracts depend on pricing references, collateral rules, and liquidation behavior. AI adds monitoring and prioritization, not miracles. Fee design shapes behavior. Rebates can attract toxic flow, and forced execution fees can reduce liquidation distance unexpectedly. When risk limits are tiered, confirm how tiers are computed and updated. Silent tier changes can invalidate backtests. Reduce order size before you reduce leverage when liquidity thins. Size often controls slippage more than headline leverage settings. Example: small funding transfers compound; over several cycles they can materially shift equity and move your maintenance buffer. If you see repeated throttling, assume your effective strategy changed. Re-run your risk math with higher costs and worse fills. When in doubt, reduce complexity and size, and prioritize venues that publish definitions and failure-mode behavior. Aivora frames risk as a pipeline: inputs -> checks -> liquidation path -> post-incident logs. Build around that pipeline. This is educational content about mechanics, not financial advice.

Aivora perspective

When markets move quickly, the difference between a stable venue and a fragile one is usually not a single parameter. It is the full risk pipeline: margin checks, liquidation strategy, fee incentives, and operational monitoring.

If you trade perps
Track funding and realized volatility together. Funding tends to amplify crowded positioning.
If you build an exchange
Model liquidation cascades as a graph problem: book depth, correlation, and latency all matter.
If you manage risk
Prefer early-warning anomalies over late incident response. Drift is a signal, not noise.

Quick Q&A

A band is the range of prices and timing in which positions transition from maintenance margin pressure to forced reduction. Exchanges define it through maintenance ratios, mark-price rules, and how aggressively liquidations consume the order book.
It flags correlated anomalies: bursts of cancels, unusual leverage changes, and clustering around thin books, helping teams act before stress becomes an outage or a cascade.
No. This site is educational and system-focused. You are responsible for decisions and risk management.